OptionForge · Next-interface design studies
Explore sixteen clearly labeled OptionForge interface concepts for a future command center, ForgeOS assistant, strategy, probability, Greeks, portfolio and risk experience.
Concept artwork only. Quotes, balances, “live” labels, assistant names, build numbers, and upgrade controls inside the images are illustrative. They do not establish available features or paid plans. OptionForge remains free through Microsoft Store.
This walkthrough describes a proposed workflow, not working module connections.
A shared command center could keep the market, portfolio, and next analytical question in view.
Carry the selected symbol and context into discovery.
Design question: Can a user identify the next analytical task without losing the wider portfolio context?
Open Command Center concept image · Current Command Center guideConnected screening and chain views could make the path from an idea to a specific contract easier to follow.
Keep symbol, expiry, contract identity, and data freshness attached to the selection.
Design question: Could a contract selection retain its symbol, expiry, liquidity context, and quote timestamp?
Open Option Chains concept image · Current Option Chains guideTemplates, editable legs, and payoff context could share one workspace while the user stays in control of each change.
Carry the reviewed structure into probability and sensitivity analysis.
Design question: Would users see which values come from a template and which they have changed?
Open Strategy Builder concept image · Current Strategy Builder guideSurfaces and probability views could help explain a scenario when the inputs, axes, and limits remain visible.
Keep model assumptions with the result when reviewing a position or portfolio.
Design question: Could the same analytical result remain readable in a keyboard-accessible 2D or table view?
Open Greeks analytics concept image · Current 3D Analytics guidePosition, portfolio, and risk views could connect an individual structure to concentration, exposure, and stress context.
Return to the relevant position with a reviewable analytical question.
Design question: Would each risk measure expose its assumptions, units, and underlying portfolio snapshot?
Open Risk Engine concept image · Current Risk Engine guideCommand & AI · Discover & chains · Build & trade · Model & visualize · Portfolio & risk
Future interface concept · Unified market intelligence
Explores a dense desktop overview that keeps market context, watchlists, risk signals, portfolio activity, and the ForgeOS assistant in one operational field.
Look for: Follow the relationship between the market overview, watchlist, portfolio panels, and assistant area.
Design question: Can a user identify the next analytical task without losing the wider portfolio context?
Current Command Center guideFuture interface concept · Human-guided intelligence
Explores an assistant-centered experience with visible data context, user-directed prompts, explainable summaries, and direct handoffs into analytical modules.
Look for: Look at how the assistant sits beside analytical context and exposes a place for user-directed prompts.
Design question: Could a reader distinguish an explanation, its data source, and a proposed next step?
Current Command Center guideFuture interface concept · Contextual review
Explores how an assistant could surface position context, risk observations, and next analytical steps without replacing user judgment or broker authority.
Look for: Compare the position information with the adjacent assistant review and supporting analytics.
Design question: Would a suggested review remain understandable and optional before the user acts?
Current Position guideFuture interface concept · Opportunity discovery
Explores a high-density discovery workspace with scoring, filters, heat maps, comparative metrics, watchlists, and rapid movement into deeper analysis.
Look for: Trace the path from filters and candidate rows to comparative metrics and a selected stock.
Design question: Could a user understand why a candidate appears and which filters are still active?
Current Stock Screener guideFuture interface concept · Contract intelligence
Explores a faster chain-reading surface where calls, puts, liquidity, volatility, Greeks, payoff context, and assistant notes remain visible together.
Look for: Compare the call and put tables with the selected expiry, pricing context, and supporting diagnostics.
Design question: Could a contract selection retain its symbol, expiry, liquidity context, and quote timestamp?
Current Option Chains guideFuture interface concept · Structure preparation
Explores a leg-centric workflow with contract selection, exposure summaries, payoff previews, scenario context, and clear user-authorized action boundaries.
Look for: Follow the selected contracts into the leg table and compare the surrounding payoff and exposure views.
Design question: Would each quantity, side, and contract remain explicit before transaction preparation?
Current Legs guideFuture interface concept · Precision construction
Explores an institutional-style matrix for editing many legs while keeping payoff, volatility, Greeks, probability, and strategy diagnostics immediately available.
Look for: Look at the editable leg matrix and the analytics arranged around the same structure.
Design question: Could one changed leg update dependent views while preserving the user’s place?
Current Legs guideFuture interface concept · Template-to-structure workflow
Explores a more cinematic builder that combines the strategy library, editable legs, payoff geometry, contract context, and guided analysis in one workspace.
Look for: Trace a strategy template into its leg structure and payoff view.
Design question: Would users see which values come from a template and which they have changed?
Current Strategy Builder guideFuture interface concept · Distribution-aware analysis
Explores how expected ranges, modeled probabilities, payoff zones, scenarios, and the assumptions behind them can be read without leaving the primary view.
Look for: Compare probability ranges, payoff regions, and the inputs that shape the modeled outcome.
Design question: Could a user distinguish model output from a prediction and locate the assumptions?
Current Probability guideFuture interface concept · Forward range modeling
Explores a wide analytical canvas for volatility horizons, confidence bands, price paths, distributions, and related statistics under explicit user inputs.
Look for: Read the relationship between time horizons, widening bands, and the surrounding distribution views.
Design question: Would confidence bands keep their horizon, units, and modeling assumptions visible?
Current Probability Cone guideFuture interface concept · Sensitivity intelligence
Explores a layered Greeks workspace with a principal 3D surface, supporting sensitivities, scenario controls, and contextual explanations in a single field.
Look for: Compare the main sensitivity surface with the surrounding controls and supporting metrics.
Design question: Could the same analytical result remain readable in a keyboard-accessible 2D or table view?
Current 3D Analytics guideFuture interface concept · Multidimensional risk geometry
Explores an immersive surface-first layout for reading how delta and related sensitivities change across price, time, and volatility assumptions.
Look for: Look for how axes, surface shape, and scenario inputs communicate changing sensitivity.
Design question: Could a user identify each axis and reproduce the selected scenario without relying on color alone?
Current 3D Analytics guideFuture interface concept · Position oversight
Explores a consolidated position workspace with current metrics, payoff geometry, probabilities, Greeks, events, and guided review paths.
Look for: Trace an individual position from the list into its payoff, Greeks, and review context.
Design question: Would position identity and data freshness remain visible when moving between analyses?
Current Position guideFuture interface concept · Book-level intelligence
Explores a portfolio command surface for holdings, exposure, allocation, performance, risk posture, hedging context, and cross-position diagnostics.
Look for: Move from the portfolio overview to allocation, exposure, and individual holdings.
Design question: Could users connect an aggregate risk figure back to the positions that contribute to it?
Current Portfolio guideFuture interface concept · Scenario and limit review
Explores a concentrated risk workspace for drawdown, scenario stress, concentration, limits, benchmark relationships, and potential hedge analysis.
Look for: Compare risk summaries, stress scenarios, and concentration views within the same workspace.
Design question: Would each risk measure expose its assumptions, units, and underlying portfolio snapshot?
Current Risk Engine guideFuture interface concept · Outcome visualization
Explores an expanded payoff laboratory that keeps expiration and pre-expiration curves, probability overlays, Greeks, scenarios, and strategy details connected.
Look for: Compare payoff curves with the strategy details and scenario controls around the chart.
Design question: Could users distinguish expiration and pre-expiration results and understand what changed?
Current P&L Graphics guideThe studies express design intent and possible workflows; they are not current runtime evidence, delivery commitments, performance claims, data guarantees, or release dates. Visit the current module guides for documented capability and image provenance.
The implementation path normalizes approved patterns, builds reusable UI primitives, connects them to real OptionForge view models one workflow at a time, and requires functionality, data, accessibility, performance, fallback, installation, and regression evidence before any concept is called shipped.